You are currently browsing the Dinhternet posts tagged: Obama


Swiss Family What Now?

So next ques­tion in my Form­Spring queue is,

If you were stranded on a desert island, which one per­son would you bring with you?”

Peo­ple seem to take the “desert island” ques­tion dif­fer­ent ways. Some peo­ple resign them­selves to dying on the island and try to get the most enjoy­ment as pos­si­ble out of their time left. (Their person/​items usu­ally geared towards one or more of the seven sins.) Some try to sur­vive as long as pos­si­ble on the island and hope for res­cue. (Their person/​items usu­ally geared towards sur­vival.) And some peo­ple (like me) try to get off the damn island. (Their person/​items usu­ally geared towards trans­porta­tion.) Along these lines, I’ll need a lit­tle more infor­ma­tion before I answer this one.

First, is the desert island also deserted? Tech­ni­cally, parts of Dubai can be con­sid­ered desert islands, but I don’t think I’ll need any­one to help me bust into the near­est super­car or mega-​yacht and ride off into the sunset.

Assum­ing the island is deserted, though, I would next need to know if my com­pan­ion could have super­pow­ers. Any sort of flight, tele­por­ta­tion, or super-​speed will do nicely. In a pinch, I’d even take Aquaman -

If, sadly, no super­heroes are allowed, I guess my next ques­tion would be if fic­tional char­ac­ters of any sort are OK. Mac­Gyver would be my num­ber one choice there. He even saved those suck­ers on LOST!

If only real peo­ple, could I choose a his­tor­i­cal fig­ure? (And not their corpse?) I would def­i­nitely pick Alexan­der Selkirk, the inspi­ra­tion for Robin­son Cru­soe and the ulti­mate manly man.

And finally, if I had to pick a real and liv­ing per­son, I would drag along Pres­i­dent Obama. Not sure how much of a sur­vival­ist he is, but I’m sure we’ll be found before I need to worry about that.

Plus, any of these peo­ple would be cool to talk with and learn from dur­ing the down­time before we are back in civilization.

Twitter Updates for 2009-05-20

Pow­ered by Twit­ter Tools.

The Wrong Questions With The Wrong Replies

So there’s been a lot of anger about the AIG bonuses lately. Some­one I know recently Tweeted “AIG = Arro­gance, Incom­pe­tence, and Greed.” The Huff­in­g­ton Post put up this satir­i­cal post about why these bonuses were well-​deserved. If you didn’t know, AIG used bailout money to pay “reten­tion bonuses” to mem­bers of its Finan­cial Prod­ucts Divi­sion, which got them into their cur­rent dire circumstances.

AIG has stated that they must pay the bonuses for two rea­sons. First, because they are con­trac­tu­ally oblig­ated to pay. Sec­ond, because the peo­ple who got them into this sit­u­a­tion are the only ones who can get them out again, by unwind­ing their own mess. Yes­ter­day, NPR tore both of these argu­ments apart. First, the con­tract to pay bonuses was shady from the start. Deals to assure bonuses to an entire divi­sion are unheard of. Also, the lan­guage sug­gests that it was signed know­ing that the FP Divi­sion was in trou­ble and they were needed to unwind the prob­lems. As for the sec­ond argu­ment, indi­vid­u­als who have left the com­pany were still paid the bonuses, which seems to negate that defense.

Now, dif­fer­ent parts of the gov­ern­ment are falling over each other to be the ones to fix the prob­lem for the Amer­i­can tax­pay­ers. Obama told his staff to use every legal means to get the money back. AIG CEO Liddy asked his employ­ees to return “at least half” of the bonuses. The New York Attor­ney Gen­eral and the Con­necti­cut Gov­er­nor are both pur­su­ing cases to get the money back. And now, Con­gress is vot­ing to put a 90% tax on all bonuses paid by com­pa­nies sup­ported by bailout money as well as sub­tract­ing the bonuses from AIG’s next install­ment of bailout money.

Wouldn’t this have been a lot eas­ier if we hadn’t bailed out the banks in the first place? If only we had taken more bold action instead of try­ing to put a band-​aid on the trauma.