You are currently browsing the Dinhternet posts tagged: Movies


The Chronicles of Rick Roll

Saw an inter­est­ing trailer today:


(Thanks to ILCT for the link.)

While a fun trailer, it seems pretty dis­jointed and it’s hard for me to believe it’s a full movie. I won­der how far along they are and if it will be dated or not by the time it gets released. If and when it does come out, though, I’ll be there to see it. Gotta see if they pull it off or not, or if the trailer gave away every­thing, like most real movies do now. Plus it’ll be fun to com­pare nerd cred with my friends by rac­ing to name memes. And there’s some­thing to be said about sup­port­ing deriv­a­tive works. (Speak­ing of which, I won­der if they got license for all that mate­r­ial.)

Any­way, I hope that Pork & Beans is going to be part of the sound­track:

Hero With A Thousand Faces

Accord­ing to Joseph Camp­bell, all sto­ries fol­low the same plot — the monomyth:

A hero ven­tures forth from the world of com­mon day into a region of super­nat­ural won­der: fab­u­lous forces are there encoun­tered and a deci­sive vic­tory is won: the hero comes back from this mys­te­ri­ous adven­ture with the power to bestow boons on his fel­low man.

Of course, not every story includes every part of the mon­o­myth, but they do fol­low the same path, at least for part of the way. If this is true, I sup­pose I should stop grip­ing about Hol­ly­wood doing noth­ing but remakes these days. After all, every story is a remake.

But I was watch­ing The King’s Speech last night, and it was a great movie. But I remem­bered from the trailer (and from the intro and outro bits of the movie) that this was “based on the incred­i­ble true story”:

So it made me curi­ous about how his­tor­i­cally accu­rate the movie was. At least they had the balls to say “based on” and not cop­ping out by say­ing “inspired by true events” like some other recent movies:

What does that even mean?! Frank Her­bert could wrote Dune after he was inspired by the true event of play­ing in his back­yard and see­ing some earth­worms. Bruce Wayne could have become the great­est super­hero ever because he was inspired by the true event of hav­ing a bat fly in his win­dow. (That’s right. It’s real to me.)

Speak­ing of real­ism in Bat­man:

(from Biz­zaro.)

Big Bat Deal

If you haven’t heard, Warner Bros. Pic­tures announced yes­ter­day that Anne Hath­away would play Cat­woman and Tom Hardy would play Bane in Chris Nolan’s next Bat­man movie, The Dark Knight Rises.

I dunno how this strikes you, but it’s kinda a big deal in the comic/​movie nerd-​dom. The Anne Hath­away bit is get­ting a lot of atten­tion in par­tic­u­lar, but I think both parts are impor­tant — espe­cially as the first offi­cial word about the new movie.

Since Dark Knight came out in 2008, the rumor mill/​fan wish­list has been churn­ing out new stuff all the time. First it was Kris­ten Bell as Harley Quinn, Mar­ion Cotil­lard as Cat­woman, Johnny Depp as Rid­dler, and Anne Hath­away as Bat­girl. Then Harley was out since there would be no Joker. Then Heath Ledger’s Joker would be briefly in with either unused footage or CGI, and the impli­ca­tion that Harley could be in again. Then Mar­ion Cotil­lard was out as Cat­woman. Then Johnny Depp was out, but Joseph Gordon-​Levitt might be tak­ing on Rid­dler. Then Tom Hardy was attached for an unknown role. Then Tom Hardy was Dr. Hugo Strange. Then Cat­woman could be any of sev­eral women, includ­ing Megan Fox, Eva Green, Naomi Watts, Keira Knight­ley, Anne Hath­away, Jes­sica Biel, Kate Mara, Char­lotte Riley, and Gemma Arter­ton. I’m sure that’s not in the right order and that there’s plenty more that I missed. This is just rumors that were big enough to be reported and I hap­pened to read them and recall them as I write this. With all that crazi­ness, a bit of clar­ity and focus is good, even if some fans feel their wish­list cast­ings were better.

First, my thoughts on Tom Hardy as Bane: it was def­i­nitely a sur­prise. How­ever, not as bad as other peo­ple have taken it. Bane is a rel­a­tively newer mem­ber of Batman’s Rogues’ Gallery, and for some of my friends, their only expo­sure to him was a brain­less min­ion of Poi­son Ivy’s in the Bat­man & Robin travesty.

In the comics, he was born and raised in a Caribbean prison, forced by the cor­rupt gov­ern­ment to live out his rev­o­lu­tion­ary father’s life sen­tence after his father had escaped the government’s reaches. In prison, he built his body and learned quickly about all top­ics from books and other inmates, includ­ing a priest who taught him the clas­sics. He also grew ruth­less in prison, becom­ing the “king” of Pena Dura. The prison staff try to take him down by forc­ing him to do drug tri­als of “Venom,” which has killed every­one before­hand. Bane sur­vives the drug, though, and finds that it makes him stronger. He mas­ter­minds an escape from prison and go to Gotham, which he sees as a big­ger prison, and aims to unseat Bat­man and become “king” there. He frees the worst of the worst from Arkham Asy­lum to wear down Bat­man, then fig­ures out his iden­tity, sneaks into the Bat­cave, and breaks Bruce Wayne’s back.

I under­stand that Nolan’s Bane will have an Amer­i­can mil­i­tary back­ground instead of a Caribbean prison one. This def­i­nitely works for the phys­i­cal train­ing and the Venom, but I’m not sure how the edu­ca­tion, ruth­less­ness, and moti­va­tion for tar­get­ing Bat­man will work out. It can be done, though. My big­ger con­cern is just how well Bane fits into Nolan’s Gotham. H’s def­i­nitely a gritty real vil­lain, but he plays a slow game, wait­ing months for the other vil­lains to wear Bat­man down after the Arkham break­out. Are they going to have lots of cameos for a Batman-​gets-​tired mon­tage? Maybe Bane will find another way to lower Batman’s guard. Per­haps my biggest con­cern is how the movie will end. Nolan’s con­tract is for three movies, with an option for a fourth, but he does not seem to be inter­ested in exer­cis­ing that option. Will he take the “Man Who Broke The Bat” moment away from Bane? That’s kinda #1 in Bane’s high­light reel. But if Bane does man­age to do this, how does Bat­man “win” ? In the comics, he had some­one else take his place until he got healed by meta-​human pow­ers, which def­i­nitely does not fit in Nolan’s Gotham. (And as a side note, I won­der if Bane will even fig­ure out Bruce’s iden­tity and attack him in the Bat­cave, since the Bat­cave was destroyed at the end of Bat­man Begins and was not rebuilt in Dark Knight.)

As for Anne Hath­away as Cat­woman… it could go either way for me. I think Mar­ion Cotil­lard looked more the part, but hey, Hol­ly­wood can do some crazy shit. And Catwoman’s had a lot of dif­fer­ent looks on the screen and off. As Vince T showed on my Face­book wall, Anne Hathaway’s got the sex appeal down. I’m a bit con­cerned about the action sequences, but that’s what stunt dou­bles are for, and her face will be cov­ered. My biggest gripe about this cast­ing is that I have a hard time see­ing chem­istry between her and Chris­t­ian Bale. Partly because of the age thing, but eight years’ dif­fer­ence is still a lot bet­ter than the twenty-​year gap she faced with Steve Car­rell in Get Smart. (Some parts of that were bor­der­line creepy, saved only by Steve Carrell/​Max Smart’s child­ish­ness.) But moreso because of the com­plex Catwoman/​Batman rela­tion­ship, and how Anne Hath­away has always been type­cast as an ingénue, at least in my mind.

So, what are your thoughts on this news?